by SCOTT HENSLEY
June 12, 2014 5:33 PM ET
Why do some bike-share riders skip helmets?
Back in 2012, we asked some bicyclists in Washington, D.C., about their helmet habits. Here’s what they told us.
Bike-sharing is taking cities by storm.
Rental stations across town give people a quick way to get around — and get some exercise.
But there’s a catch.
The proportion of bike-related head injuries seen in trauma centers increased over time (months) in cities that launched bike-sharing programs.
When you pick up a bike, you usually have to bring your own helmet or go without one. If you ride with your hair flapping in the breeze, your risk for brain injury goes up.
A group of Canadian and American researchers wondered what effect bike-share systems had on the frequency of brain injuries. And they came up with a way to look at the potential problem.
They analyzed data on the treatment of serious brain injuries at trauma centers in five cities before and after bike-sharing programs were started. The data were lumped together for Montreal, Washington, D.C., Minneapolis, Boston and Miami Beach, Fla. For comparison, the researchers also looked at five cities that didn’t have bike-sharing during the study period, including Milwaukee and Seattle.
The proportion of head injuries attributed to bike accidents increased in cities after they implemented bike-sharing programs. Overall, there was a 14 percent greater risk of bicycle-related head injuries in people admitted to trauma centers after sharing programs were implemented. There was no increase seen in the control cities.
“The study basically confirmed our worries,” says Janessa Graves, who works on pediatric injury prevention at Washington State University’s nursing school in Spokane. She’s the lead author of the study, published online Thursday by theAmerican Journal of Public Health. “Public bike-share initiatives are great wellness initiatives,” she tells Shots. “But without providing helmets, we were concerned that we would see an increase in head injuries. And we did.”
Now, a study like this one can’t prove cause and effect. Other factors that might have been missed by the researchers could have been at work. The researchers didn’t have information on individual patients and don’t know whether the people who were hurt in bike-share cities were actually using bikes they rented. Also, a bump seen in the graph showing the proportion of head injuries before the launch of bike-share programs might be a sign of problems with the data.
Even so, the results seem to add up.
“Certainly the data are solid enough that we need to look more carefully at these kinds of programs,” says Andrea Gielin, director of the Johns Hopkins Center for Injury Research and Policy. “I think it’s an important study that raises some concerns that we need to pay attention to.” She wasn’t involved in the research.
“When we’re trying to promote more bicycling,” Gielen says, “we need to do that in the context of increasing helmet use.”
What on Earth is a poor Urban Cyclists to do? Here is a report that promises to derail the nascent development of the Mikael Colville-Andersen notion that helmets are a hoax. But NPR is hardly a flighty group and no doubt have done their homework with respect to this study.
But be prepared for the wild-eyed neophytes to bellow loudly that their bull is being gored and someone must pay!